DV ACT 2005   |   IPC 498A   |   Maintenance






Number of Documents : 1

INSTALL ANDROID APP



1.

DV Act 2005
IN THE COURT OF SHRI RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, SPECIAL JUDGE CBI­02 (P.C. ACT), DISTT. NORTH WEST, ROHINI COURTS, DELHI

on

2016-11-24
Crl. (A) No. 46 or New Crl. A No. 49817 of 2016 or 20Rajneesh Kumar GuptaMs. Anjana Rani vs Mr. Amit jindalDV ACT 2005

No Domestic Relation no DV : From the material on record, it is clear that the appellant has left the matrimonial house in the year 2009 and has been living separately from the respondents No. 2 and 3. In the appeal, the appellant has made the allegations that she used to visit the respondent No. 2 and 3 very regularly on every weekend and every holiday. These allegations shows that the appellant is residing separately and has only temporarily visiting the residence of the respondent No. 2 and 3. There is nothing to show that the appellant has ever resided in the household or residence of the respondents No. 2 and 3 continuously and as a matter of right and has lived in the shared household with the respondents No. 2 and 3. Keeping in view the abovesaid judgment, I am of the opinion that there is no domestic relationship between the appellant and the respondents No. 2 and 3.
DOWNLOAD   |   GOOGLE DOCS   |   VIEW