DV Act 2005
|HC of U.P.|
2016-11-09Writ C No 53503 of 2016J.Suneet KumarKusum vs State of U.P.DV ACT 2005
All Live-in Relations can't be relationship in the nature of Marriage
In the facts of the case before the Supreme Court the appellant (lady) had entered into the relationship knowing fully well that the man is married and therefore the Court declined to grant her any relief holding that the relationship would not be a relationship in the nature of marriage.
2) The ratio of Indra Sharma squarely applies on the facts of the present case for the reason it is admitted and pleaded in the writ petition that the second petitioner entered into a relationship with the first petitioner who is married and her marriage has not been dissolved by any competent court as on date, therefore, such a relationship cannot be granted any protection.DOWNLOAD | GOOGLE DOCS | VIEW