DV ACT 2005   |   IPC 498A   |   Maintenance






Number of Documents : 1

INSTALL ANDROID APP



1.

DV Act 2005
HC of ORISSA, CUTTACK

on

2017-01-04
Crl Rev No 70 of 2016J. S.K.SahooSayed Fakiruddin vs Hena BegumDV ACT 2005

Maintenance is not Meant for the Wife to Live in Luxury. It Should be Fair and Reasonable and Take into Account the Husband's Earnings

Perused the judgment of learned Magistrate where the income side of the petitioner has been discussed. It seems that the learned Magistrate has accepted the statement of the opposite party even though no corresponding documents relating to the income of the petitioner has been filed and no clinching oral evidence has been adduced in that behalf. The monetary relief in the form of maintenance for the aggrieved person as well as her children as per section 20 of the P.W.D.V. Act, 2005 should be adequate, fair and reasonable and consistent with the standard of living to which the aggrieved person is accustomed. The amount should not be so fixed which would enable the aggrieved person as well as her children to live in luxury. The needs/requirements of the claimants, the income of the husband of the aggrieved person, the status of the husbandís family and the standard of life which the claimants would have led had they continued to live in the house of the respondent should also be considered. The mechanical way of fixation of maintenance at the whim and pleasure of the Court is not permissible. The decision should not be arbitrary but judicious.
DOWNLOAD   |   GOOGLE DOCS   |   VIEW